The provision to give such rights to the department has been made in the new Income Tax Bill-2025.

The department can also seize property if needed to investigate tax evasion. Section 132 of the current IT Act-1961 gives tax officials the right to conduct searches and seize properties and all types of accounts. However, honest taxpayers will not face any problem in this.

SR Patnaik, tax expert at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, says that this search and seizure should be done only as an exception and not as a rule. It is important to respect the privacy of every person in the digital space, so this law should be used only on the basis of solid reasons.

Officials can also break lockers and safes on undisclosed income.

According to Clause-247 of the Income Tax Bill, if a person has any information related to undisclosed income, property or accounts locked in a locker, safe or box and does not have its key, then the Income Tax Department also has the right to break it. They can enter any building and place and conduct a search.

• If the access code of any lock is not available then Income Tax officers can also break it or open it in their own way.
• Income Tax officials can obtain vital information related to tax evasion by raiding your computer system or even virtual space to access such information.

Clarity on virtual digital space is needed in the new bill

Experts say that the expansion of virtual digital space i.e. VDS under the new Income Tax Bill raises significant concerns regarding constitutional validity and enforcement. While the government may justify it as a measure to curb tax evasion and undeclared digital assets, the vague definition of VDS essentially allows monitoring of access to a person’s financial and private digital assets.

• Without safeguards, this new bill creates a conflict between financial scrutiny and individual privacy rights. This could potentially lead to legal challenges and erode trust in India’s digital ecosystem.

These officers will have the right to access the data.

The officers who have been given the right to access your personal data under the new Income Tax Bill include Joint Director or Additional Director, Joint Commissioner or Additional Commissioner, Assistant Director or Deputy Director, Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner or Income Tax Officer or Tax Recovery Officer.

Related Articles:-

• KVS Admission 2025-26: Kendriya Vidyalaya Admission Date Announced, Balvatika and Class 1 Age Limit
• Banks offer up to 9% interest on FDs For Senior citizens, Check detailed rates of different banks
• Google Pay, Phone Pay Will Not Work on THESE Mobile Numbers From April 1, Details Here
• 7th Pay Commission: Central govt may announce an increase in Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) next week
• Bank Holidays: Banks will be Closed For 3 Consecutive Days From Today, Check List Here

The post Tax officials have got many legal rights in new Income Tax Bill 2025 first appeared on Rightsofemployees.com.

\This decision will reduce litigation. The Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) said that the 30-day time limit given to assessing officers to take a decision has been reduced to 21 days.

According to a statement, if the taxpayer does not agree to the adjustment or partially agrees, the case will be immediately referred by the Centralized Processing Center (CPC) to the Assessing Officer, who will give his opinion to the CPC within 21 days that the adjustment has been made. may or may not go.

Will have to answer the complaint in 21 days Rajat Mohan, Senior Partner, AMRG & Associates, said that in many cases involving refund adjustments, the CPC found that wrong classification of demand or non-receipt of response from the assessing officer resulted in wrong adjustment of refund. In such a situation, unnecessary litigation took place. He said that after the latest instructions, taxpayers’ complaints will have to be answered within 21 days.

The DIT (Systems) in an instruction to the field formation said, in some cases, as a result of issue of information under section 245, the assessees had replied on the demand portal that the demands are incorrect. Such wrong demand has been stayed by the Assessing Officer/TAT/High Court.

It has been pointed out that wrong classification of such demand as ‘correct and collectible’ or non-providing of response by the assessing officers to the response of the assessees has led to incorrect adjustments of refunds against such demands by CPCs, leading to complaints. And there has been litigation.

The post Income Tax Refund Rules: Big news for Taxpayer! changed the rules of tax refund, know what will be the benefit first appeared on Rightsofemployees.com.