Land Acquisition Rules: With the expansion of infrastructure and industrial projects across the country, land acquisition has become a very sensitive issue. In such a situation, the question often arises whether the government can acquire a citizen’s land without his consent? The answer is – yes, it can in some situations. But, there is a fixed legal process for this, which cannot be ignored.
What do the Constitution and the law say regarding land acquisition?
The government has the right to acquire land from the public in ‘public interest’. Both the Constitution of the country and the acquisition law allow this. Currently, the government acquires land under the ‘Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013’ (LARR Act).
This law ensures that whenever the government or a private company acquires land in ‘public interest’, the landowners and the affected families get proper compensation. If a house is acquired, then a new house is given, or its reasonable price, or help in construction.
This law was brought in place of the old Land Acquisition Act of 1894 to increase transparency, prevent forceful acquisition and make social impact assessment mandatory. It provides for compensation of at least 2 times the market value in rural areas and 1 times the market value in urban areas. Along with this, the requirement of resettling the affected family and social consent has also been made mandatory.
What is the stand of the Supreme Court on land acquisition?
The Supreme Court made its view on land acquisition very clear in the case ‘Sukh Dutt Ratra vs State of Himachal Pradesh’ (2022). In its decision, it said that the government cannot forcibly take possession of a person’s private property without due process and without compensation. This case was related to Article 300-A of the Indian Constitution, which says that no person can be deprived of his property without due process authorized by law.
The court clearly said that acquisition without due process is not only a violation of the Constitution, but it is also a violation of human rights. The Supreme Court said in clear words that if the government has to acquire someone’s land, then it will have to follow the prescribed process of land acquisition and it is mandatory to give proper compensation.
Is it necessary to take consent for land acquisition?
The answer depends on the purpose for which the land is being acquired. According to the LARR Act, 2013, consent is necessary in some cases. In some cases, land can be acquired without consent. However, in both cases, compensation and then settlement of the affected families will have to be arranged.
Nature of acquisition | Is consent required? |
Government projects (like roads, railways) | No |
Private Projects |
Yes, consent of 80% landowners is necessary
|
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) |
Yes, 70% consent required
|
This means that the government can acquire land for purposes such as building roads or railways by paying just compensation. It does not matter whether you agree or not. However, if a private company wants to start a project in an area, it cannot acquire the land unless it has the written consent of a large number of landowners.
How much compensation will be given in land acquisition?
In the LARR Act, better compensation has been arranged for the affected people. In rural areas, at least 2 times the market price will be given as compensation. Whereas, in urban areas, 1 times the market price is given. Apart from this, there is also a provision for rehabilitation, cash assistance and alternative land or employment.
However, there have been disputes over the ‘market price’. The government ‘circle rate’ is often much lower than the ground reality. Due to this, farmers and land owners feel cheated.
Can you refuse to give land?
If the land acquisition is in the public interest and due process of law has been followed, the right of individual refusal is limited. However, in certain situations, the affected person or group can file a petition in the court. Such as:
- There may be a flaw in the acquisition process.
- There is no justice in rehabilitation or compensation.
- There may be a violation of the rules relating to consent.
Strictness of the courts and famous decisions
The judiciary has time and again made it clear that transparency and genuine public interest are essential in land acquisition. The Supreme Court has also remarked, “Public interest should be a meaningful objective in land acquisition, not a mere excuse.”
If we talk about some major land acquisition cases, the most famous was the Singur case (West Bengal). In this, the Supreme Court declared the land acquired for Tata Motors illegal and ordered it to be returned to the farmers. At the same time, during the construction of Yamuna Expressway (Uttar Pradesh), there was a controversy over the low compensation given to the farmers and the land being later allotted to private builders. Long legal battles were also fought over rehabilitation and transparency in the industrial areas of Haryana and Rajasthan.
Related Articles:-
Bank Alert: SBI customers will receive calls only from these numbers, the bank has released a list…
IMD Weather: Heavy rain will occur in the next 3 hours, storm with a speed of 100 KM