The Vishva Hindu Parishad has urged the Special Investigation Team to demand proof from prominent Opposition leaders, prompting a sharp counter-accusation of “distraction tactics” from the Congress.
NEW DELHI — The political confrontation surrounding the alleged misappropriation of donations at the Ayodhya Ram Temple intensified following a formal request by the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) to law enforcement, demanding that top Opposition figures be summoned for questioning over their public claims.
Add rightsofemployees.com as a Preferred Source
In a letter addressed to Ayodhya Deputy Superintendent of Police and investigating officer Ashutosh Tiwari, VHP International President Alok Kumar argued that public remarks made by several prominent politicians indicate they may hold crucial information regarding the case. The letter specifically names:
-
Prof. Ram Gopal Yadav (Samajwadi Party leader)
-
Arvind Kejriwal (Aam Aadmi Party National Convenor)
-
Sanjay Singh (AAP Rajya Sabha MP)
-
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (Congress leader)
The VHP chief requested that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) use relevant legal provisions to record their statements, urging that they disclose the factual basis and sources behind their claims.
Detailed Allegations Cited by the VHP
According to the VHP’s communication, the named political figures have previously detailed specific estimates and mechanics regarding the alleged financial irregularities:
-
The ₹20,000-Crore Claim: The letter notes that SP’s Ram Gopal Yadav publicly alleged an embezzlement scheme exceeding ₹20,000 crore, involving the disappearance of gold, silver, diamonds, and cash offerings by influential individuals.
-
Valuables and Ornaments: AAP’s Arvind Kejriwal had raised concerns regarding the theft of high-value offerings—including crowns, ornaments, and silver lamps—while questioning the integrity of the ongoing probe.
-
The ₹200-Crore Estimate: AAP MP Sanjay Singh reportedly alleged a theft totaling more than ₹200 crore involving numerous employees, and has previously approached the SIT with documents relating to separate land transactions.
-
Operational Questions: Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra had publicly questioned how such an extensive operation could occur under the radar, raising questions about deactivated CCTV cameras and the potential involvement of senior administrators rather than just lower-level staff.
VHP Escalation Framework
├── Legal Step: Formal letter sent to Ayodhya DSP Ashutosh Tiwari
├── Core Demand: Summon 4 top Opposition leaders for official statements
└── Legal Warning: If claims lack factual basis, pursue prosecution for promoting enmity
Kumar added that if the claims are proven to be unfounded fabrications intended to stoke public animosity, the agency should pursue legal action against the leaders.
Congress Fires Back, Accusing VHP of Deflection
The Congress party sharply rebuffed the VHP’s legal push on Sunday, accusing the right-wing outfit and the ruling BJP of attempting to shield the actual perpetrators by changing the focus of the investigation.
In a video statement shared on social media platform X, Congress leader Pawan Khera criticized the logic of asking the whistleblowers to produce evidence instead of demanding accountability from the official investigators.
Khera questioned the rationale of the request, stating, “Does that mean someone else commits the theft, and someone else provides the evidence?” He further charged that the authorities have no genuine interest in catching those responsible for the missing offerings, claiming the move is an attempt to emotionally exploit Hindu sentiments for political survival.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Why is the VHP demanding that Opposition leaders be questioned?
The VHP argues that since leaders from the Congress, AAP, and SP have cited specific numbers (like ₹200 crore to ₹20,000 crore) and detailed specific missing items (like gold ornaments and silver lamps), they must legally possess credible evidence or insider sources that could help the SIT complete its probe.
What is the primary counter-argument from the Congress party?
The Congress contends that the burden of proof lies entirely on the investigating agencies, not on opposition leaders raising public concerns. They argue that demanding evidence from whistleblowers is a tactic designed to stall the investigation and shield the actual perpetrators.
What specific laws are being invoked in this dispute?
The VHP leader’s letter suggests using standard code provisions to record official statements. Furthermore, the letter states that if the allegations are proven to be intentionally fabricated without any factual basis, legal action should be taken against the politicians for spreading misleading claims that promote social enmity.
Recent Posts
- RSS Condemns Ram Temple Donation Theft, Warns of Conspiracy
- Thailand Travel Guidelines 2026: Indian Embassy Releases 11-Point Checklist for Tourists
- 3 Days Instead of Weeks: Inside the EPFO’s Massive New Speed Reform for PF Withdrawals
- MeitY Orders Take-Down of 7 Battery Apps Over Electric Rickshaw Remote Sabotage
- IMD Heavy Rain Forecast: Red Alert Issued for Several States; Widespread Monsoon Covers Delhi-NCR
Add rightsofemployees.com as a Preferred Source
